Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Concerns about privacy of data of public DNA projects, etc. .....

  1. #1
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,512
    Sex
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Ethnicity
    Pictland/Deira
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-M222-FGC5864
    mtDNA (M)
    H5r*

    Concerns about privacy of data of public DNA projects, etc. .....

    I agree that peoples' data should not be added to projects or redisplayed without their permission, that gives the whole community a bad name. As for how best to spend *your* money everyone has to weigh that up based on what they are trying to find out and how advanced discoveries are in their genetic neck of the woods. But FullG is fundamentally different from just buying more STRs because the SNPs they find are effectively guaranteed to make people identical by descent whereas the additional Y37 tests you mention aren't. Being a bit of a SNP purist then I find the idea of FullG very tempting and I wouldn't call STRs a tool to 'define some boundaries' unless your circumstances are such that you can prove an IBD local tree. I take your point about your SNP being quite a recent one (I'm not clear just how young it is, sorry) but results so far indicate about 1 new SNP every 1-2 generations so you can do the maths yourself. That's a typical rate so YMMV.

    As for your data, if it is gone from all public projects and ysearch etc then it isn't in the public domain and anyone displaying it is breaching your data privacy. I would suggest you write formally to anyone doing this and if they don't delete it complain to their ISP. If the project they are displaying it in has some association with FTDNA then copy in the directors too.

    MacUalraig

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to MacUalraig For This Useful Post:

     red (10-29-2015)

  3. #2
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,051
    Sex
    Location
    Central United States
    Ethnicity
    Celtic, Goidelic
    Y-DNA (P)
    DF13>FGC5494>FGC5496
    mtDNA (M)
    H11a2a>C12014T

    United States of America Netherlands Isle of Man Scotland Poland Northern Ireland
    When a person purchases a FtDNA product, personal profiles are defined with an informational notices of what information entered that can be public or private. The customer has the choice. Just as the choice of joining a project, uploading to YSearch, etc. Joining a project does expose some identifying information about you to the project volunteer administrator. It may also expose non-identifying information about you through the project's Public Project Website (should it have one).

    >It seems from your Post that you and Mike W view yourself as "Standard Setters".
    >looking at USA Surname frequencies based on the 2000 Census
    >As noted above, neither of you are for L371. I doubt neither of you have the expressed written and formal consent from FTDNA nor FTDNA paying participants to datamine / datascrape the data you are harvesting - analyzing - reposting.

    With public posted Kit data, no permission is needed for researchers, "Standard Setters", hobbyists and or anyone else to take and analyze your data and incase you do not know what the word Analysis effectively means;

    Wiki: 'Analysis of data is a process of inspecting, cleaning, transforming, and modeling data with the goal of discovering useful information, suggesting conclusions, and supporting decision making. Data analysis has multiple facets and approaches, encompassing diverse techniques under a variety of names, in different business, science, and social science domaains."

    We all know where the data would have came from so please, do not make yourself Public in the World's DNA data bases going forward. I am sure we can do without it.

    MJost
    148326, FGC-0FW1R, YSID6 & YF3272 R-DF13>FGC5494>*7448>*5496>*5521>*5511>*5539>*5538>* 5508>*5524
     
    Watterson USA GD1/67 & GD3/111, *5508+. GD1ís fatherís sister-23andme pred. 3rd Cous w/ 0.91% DNA shared-3 seg. Largest on Chr1 w/non-Euro admix affirms my NPE paternal Watterson line via aDNA & YDNA. A 2nd pred. 4th cous has same DKA b. 1840's Georgia and MDKA d 1703 IOM. 3rd Cousin FtDNA FF is from the Watterson Ala. *5538+ b. IOM w/ GD6/67 & GD8/111 -SGD3. FGC5539+ a Scot-Ross GD13/111 -SGD8

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to MJost For This Useful Post:

     red (10-29-2015)

  5. #3
    Banned
    Posts
    7
    Sex
    Omitted

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikewww View Post
    Second, I will look for a place to open a thread on project data privacy. That has been discussed on multiple forums but if someone wants to discuss it lets get it in the right category of this forum.
    OK Mike go for it and open up a thread on data privacy / data mining / data scraping of DNA records. And, explain your system of contacting persons who let their DNA records be shown at FTDNA ... then had a change of heart and made their data non-public. How do you, Robert, Mark and other DNA Excellers think you can continue to use their data in "your" Excel data hosted at Yahoo?

  6. #4
    Registered Users
    Posts
    4,428
    Sex
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b
    mtDNA (M)
    H

    Concerns about privacy of data of public DNA projects, etc. .....

    I've started this up as there are concerns about this and this is general to a number of projects. It also pertains to mt DNA projects but I didn't see a general/other category for both.

    Here is the original portion of another posting that kicked this off. I've excerpted these two contiguous paragraphs verbatim and edited them out of the original post since they were off-topic. I did not add or change any highlighting/underlining, etc. This was originally a response to Robert Casey under a thread I created so I'm referenced to as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by jonesge View Post
    ... It seems from your Post that you and Mike W view yourself as "Standard Setters" and I doubt neither of you have the expressed written and formal consent from FTDNA nor FTDNA paying participants to datamine / datascrape the data you are harvesting - analyzing - reposting.

    How does one remove themselves BOTH from FTDNA and Your and Mike's unauthorized data? I know how it's done at FTDNA ... so what is your and Mike's process? As FTDNA Project Admins ... do you think you may be taken to task on this? Do you think that Yahoo knows the real scoop on your cavalier antics and how they breach both personal privacies & familial privacies?
    ...
    Last edited by TigerMW; 09-18-2013 at 07:56 PM.

  7. #5
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,051
    Sex
    Location
    Central United States
    Ethnicity
    Celtic, Goidelic
    Y-DNA (P)
    DF13>FGC5494>FGC5496
    mtDNA (M)
    H11a2a>C12014T

    United States of America Netherlands Isle of Man Scotland Poland Northern Ireland
    >persons who let their DNA records be shown at FTDNA ... then had a change of heart and made their data non-public. How do you, Robert, Mark and other DNA Excellers think you can continue to use their data in "your" Excel data hosted at Yahoo

    Geewiz, you have already taken the public fork in the road and its no turning back. I am sorry you have felt neglected and even slighted in the past in a few other venues concerning your L371 surname heritage and your insistant comments, and now wish to step out of the lime light, but now give us your complete data so we can do the best job possible, such as your bank account number, your central government ID number, your first born, credit card numbers, home address, keys to your vehicle, etc.

    I am out.

    MJost
    148326, FGC-0FW1R, YSID6 & YF3272 R-DF13>FGC5494>*7448>*5496>*5521>*5511>*5539>*5538>* 5508>*5524
     
    Watterson USA GD1/67 & GD3/111, *5508+. GD1ís fatherís sister-23andme pred. 3rd Cous w/ 0.91% DNA shared-3 seg. Largest on Chr1 w/non-Euro admix affirms my NPE paternal Watterson line via aDNA & YDNA. A 2nd pred. 4th cous has same DKA b. 1840's Georgia and MDKA d 1703 IOM. 3rd Cousin FtDNA FF is from the Watterson Ala. *5538+ b. IOM w/ GD6/67 & GD8/111 -SGD3. FGC5539+ a Scot-Ross GD13/111 -SGD8

  8. #6
    Registered Users
    Posts
    723
    Sex
    Location
    Texas
    Ethnicity
    English, Irish, German
    Nationality
    US
    Y-DNA (P)
    L21>L226>FGC5639

    England Germany Netherlands France Ireland Switzerland
    Quote Originally Posted by jonesge View Post
    OK Mike go for it and open up a thread on data privacy / data mining / data scraping of DNA records. And, explain your system of contacting persons who let their DNA records be shown at FTDNA ... then had a change of heart and made their data non-public. How do you, Robert, Mark and other DNA Excellers think you can continue to use their data in "your" Excel data hosted at Yahoo?
    There are several legally binding releases that made along the way:

    1) When you sent your kit into FTDNA, you have to sign a release to make your results available to those who match other submissions:

    http://www.familytreedna.com/forms/F...lease-form.pdf

    2) When you join any FTDNA project, you agree to let your information be displayed in the manner established by that project administrator (which can be changed at any time).
    Any and all your genetic data (as well as genealogical data entered) could be be posted on web sites (FTDNA and others) and then becomes public domain data. Once your
    information has been released to public domain - that is permanent release which can not be rescinded.

    However, you can at a later point in time, make your data private which means that your genetic data will no longer be included in future FTDNA reports. However, anyone
    who has acquired your genetic data has no obligation to remove any data that has been published to the public domain. As a courtesy, most FTDNA admins will remove
    any data upon request. However, WFN and custom reports include copies of FTDNA reports which could take time to update. FTDNA reports are immediately updated
    and since most people use these reports regularly, data that is taken private usually goes away in a short time frame.

    http://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers.aspx?id=6#395

  9. #7
    Senior Member
    Posts
    106
    Sex
    Location
    Cascadia
    Y-DNA (P)
    R-L627 L626+ L625+
    mtDNA (M)
    J1b1a1a (FMS)

    Ireland Scotland England Germany Wales
    Anyone else on here old enough to remember when the monolithic Ma Bell went after companies doing knock-off phone books? Lost soundly. Can't copyright data...

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to David For This Useful Post:

     ilmari (09-19-2013)

  11. #8
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,051
    Sex
    Location
    Central United States
    Ethnicity
    Celtic, Goidelic
    Y-DNA (P)
    DF13>FGC5494>FGC5496
    mtDNA (M)
    H11a2a>C12014T

    United States of America Netherlands Isle of Man Scotland Poland Northern Ireland
    Yes, there was U.S. Supreme Court case FEIST PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) that really buried the copyright status olf data.

    MJost
    148326, FGC-0FW1R, YSID6 & YF3272 R-DF13>FGC5494>*7448>*5496>*5521>*5511>*5539>*5538>* 5508>*5524
     
    Watterson USA GD1/67 & GD3/111, *5508+. GD1ís fatherís sister-23andme pred. 3rd Cous w/ 0.91% DNA shared-3 seg. Largest on Chr1 w/non-Euro admix affirms my NPE paternal Watterson line via aDNA & YDNA. A 2nd pred. 4th cous has same DKA b. 1840's Georgia and MDKA d 1703 IOM. 3rd Cousin FtDNA FF is from the Watterson Ala. *5538+ b. IOM w/ GD6/67 & GD8/111 -SGD3. FGC5539+ a Scot-Ross GD13/111 -SGD8

  12. #9
    Registered Users
    Posts
    4,428
    Sex
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b
    mtDNA (M)
    H

    Quote Originally Posted by MacUalraig View Post
    I agree that peoples' data should not be added to projects or redisplayed without their permission, that gives the whole community a bad name. As for how best to spend *your* money everyone has to weigh that up based on what they are trying to find out and how advanced discoveries are in their genetic neck of the woods. But FullG is fundamentally different from just buying more STRs because the SNPs they find are effectively guaranteed to make people identical by descent whereas the additional Y37 tests you mention aren't. Being a bit of a SNP purist then I find the idea of FullG very tempting and I wouldn't call STRs a tool to 'define some boundaries' unless your circumstances are such that you can prove an IBD local tree. I take your point about your SNP being quite a recent one (I'm not clear just how young it is, sorry) but results so far indicate about 1 new SNP every 1-2 generations so you can do the maths yourself. That's a typical rate so YMMV.

    As for your data, if it is gone from all public projects and ysearch etc then it isn't in the public domain and anyone displaying it is breaching your data privacy. I would suggest you write formally to anyone doing this and if they don't delete it complain to their ISP. If the project they are displaying it in has some association with FTDNA then copy in the directors too.

    MacUalraig
    Just as an FYI. I only collect data from from clearly public web pages like the FTDNA public project screens and Ysearch. I also do not use any automated programs or robots to collect data.

    Anyone who asks to be removed from any data I maintain is removed. I don't think it is a big deal though as I can only remember that happening once.... about a year ago or so and that fellow might even be involved in this thread. At the time, I actually went through an extra gyration of purging files on the yahoo group folders inserted by others just as a courtesy to the fellow, although others had to recreate network diagrams and the like so I don't think the purging was universally appreciated. I think the fellow forgot to delete his Ysearch ID though, but I certainly wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole...

    Still, when someone makes data public, I don't know how one gets it back. It's kind of like spilt milk or letting the cat out of the bag. Just checked for grins.... whoops, if it is the same fellow, the Ysearch record is still there even today. It really is hard to get the cat back in the bag. I think I'll save another screen print file for proof as well. Gees, its even easy to find his FTDNA kit # through internet searches.

    It won't do any good to contact ISPs or other corporate entities in these cases, from what I can see.
    Last edited by TigerMW; 09-19-2013 at 05:15 AM.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to TigerMW For This Useful Post:

     ilmari (09-19-2013)

  14. #10
    Registered Users
    Posts
    840
    Sex
    Ethnicity
    Korean & Anglo-American
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-U-152
    mtDNA (M)
    B4a
    mtDNA (P)
    H7

    United States of America Sweden South Korea United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by jonesge View Post
    your bank account number, your central government ID number, your first born, credit card numbers, home address, keys to your vehicle

    Mike (Mod.) ... the above intimidating type of comments relating for a plan of nefarious identity theft is over the top and a severe and unwarranted violation of my personal privacy. Plus, what he is threatening is out and out illegal.

    Remove those comments by Mark and consider banning him permanently for making such illegal threats.

    Here's this forum rules: 2.) Administrators should only be contacted with questions or complaints if an issue is beyond the scope of forum moderators to satisfactorily address, or if a situation is serious enough (e.g., threats, violation of privacy) to warrant administrator involvement.
    It wasn't a threat, a "plan of nefarious identity theft," or anything of the sort. It was a sarcastic remark in response to your aggression. And there is nothing illegal happening here. But you know that.

    Tone it down, and consider this a warning.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scarlet Ibis For This Useful Post:

     AJL (09-19-2013),  ilmari (09-19-2013)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DNA-Tests and Privacy Concerns?
    By Soutine in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-19-2018, 07:16 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-06-2017, 04:55 AM
  3. New privacy concerns
    By Marmaduke in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-18-2013, 01:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •