Thanks. I agree, but I still would have thought that we may have turned up SNPs above Z253 as well.
I only have the raw data for the PF825+ kit and so have compared its SNPs with the information Robert Casey has posted online about his own results, rather than his raw data. The information with the FG results cautions that only SNP results with at least 95% reliability should be regarded as significant.
I have forwarded a copy of the PF825+ kit raw SNP data to Robert Casey, with the permission of the kit's owner. I could check if he is happy for me to send you a copy as well if you like. Hopefully it won't be too long before you receive your own FG results, and I think the more people working on comparisons the better.
We also have a Chromo 2.0 result (positive SNPs only, not raw data) for a different PF825 kit online in the L21 Yahoo Group, so adding those results into the comparison may clarify things further. The kit is Buchanan 200481.
Originally Posted by hoxgi
That would be great. PF825 and my cluster (253-1716-11) share some common off-modal STR mutations and it is possible that we share some common SNPs downstream of Z253. It would be good to do some comparisons to confirm where they branched when I eventually receive results (batch # 5)